11/23/2023 0 Comments Kings lakers 2002![]() reasonable individuals can agree to disagree on the appropriate ruling on a play, even after seeing it in slow motion replay multiple times! It's clear then that referees should be extended a margin of error and an occasional missed call is no grounds for assuming malfeasance.Ģ) the conclusions of my review can easily be challenged This isn't tennis, with a simple in/out decision. you are always going to have a certain amount of controversy regarding the officiating since there are so many plays which are far from clear-cut. ![]() ten players moving simulataneously with all kinds of incidental contact along the way, a variety of obscure and seldom enforced rules, and it's all played out from end to end at blazing fast speed. Let's go to the videotape.įirst up, let's set some ground rules we can all agree on:ġ) Basketball is a very difficult game to officiate Of that I assure you."Īll right David, I'm game. … My guess is it won't be pretty, but it won't be dishonest and it won't be illegal. Not content with pleading guilty to betting on games he officiated, he recently alleged that the NBA had two "company men" work the Lakers-Kings game and make calls that would help the Lakers win and set up a Game 7.ĭavid Stern had this to say: "You can watch it, you can look at it again, and you could see what we call the correct, incorrect and noncall incorrect. Now though the stakes are different - the NBA's had to deal with a full blown ref scandal, and the original bad seed Tim Donaghy isn't done yet. Along with being a popular article, it led to frequent emails requesting I review other specific games in a similar fashion, notably the "infamous" game six of the 2001-2002 playoffs between the Lakers and the Kings. maybe way too much talk.Ī couple of years back I did an extensive breakdown of the referee calls in Mavs-Heat game five of the NBA Finals. There's been a lot of talk about this next game. ![]() While Vlade Divac put up 11.0 and made 7.0, 2.0 offensive rebounds, 5.0 defensive rebounds, 3.0 assists performance, with a Player Impact Estimate (PIE) of 0.177.Lakers Kings GNBA Playoffs Officiating breakdown - from Home | Robert Horry for the Los Angeles Lakers in the Conference Finals of the NBA Playoffs, put up 7.0 and made 5.0, 3.0 offensive rebounds 11.0 defensive rebounds, 5.0 assists performance, with a Player Impact Estimate (PIE) of 0.214. Sacramento Kings matchup of the 2002 West Conference Finals NBA Playoffs were Robert Horry and Vlade Divac based 25 minutes or greater game-minutes played. The most impactful players on each team in the Los Angeles Lakers vs. ![]() Had a better score in terms of turnover percentage with 11.8 Sacramento Kings had an offensive rating of 105.3, defensive rating of 107.5, 26.0 free-throw attempts, 19.0 three-point attempts shooting it at a 0.263 percent clip as a team in this playoff game.ĭuring the regular season, Los Angeles Lakers finished the game with a record of 93, and Sacramento Kings recorded Los Angeles Lakers possessions throughout the course of the basketball game.Įvaluating Los Angeles Lakers vs Sacramento Kings’s based on the advanced stats,Sacramento Kings had a better score in the effective shooting percentage category with 0.519 percent, Los Angeles Lakers , coming ontop of the series and winning 4 playoff games as opposed to Sacramento KingsĪs we examine the head-to-head stats between both teams, we can see that Los Angeles Lakers had an offensive rating of 107.5, defensive rating of 105.3, 27.0 free-throw attempts, and 26.0 three-point attempts, shooting it at a 0.231 percent clip as a team. Out of the 7 game series of the Conference Finals of the 2002 NBA Playoffs, Los Angeles Lakers Sacramento Kings head-to-head, and both teams battled 7 times. The 2002 West Conference Finals of the NBA Playoffs featured Los Angeles Lakers vs. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |